After extending the deadline for another week, we received a total of 300 submissions!
(Can you spot the original deadline and the beginning of the extension on this graph?)Not only do we have quite a good number of them, but the quality is actually very good. It's making life harder on the reviewers :)
One of them posted this to the papers' committee list:
"Is anyone else finding it difficult to reject papers?"(The answer of course is YES!)
1 comment:
Something I'd like to see once you've finished reviewing the papers would be to plot separate accepted/rejected curves vs. submission time (also for the miniconfs).
Would be interesting to see whether there's a correlation between quality and rushed submission.
Post a Comment